JVC QL-A7 vs Rega Planar 2 (original)

Side-by-side specifications and a plain-English account of the recorded differences. Full profiles: JVC QL-A7 · Rega Planar 2 (original).

Practical differences

Highlighted cells show a lower reference price, support for more listed speeds, or the presence of a convenience feature. They are not an overall score.

The JVC QL-A7 spins its platter via direct drive; the Rega Planar 2 (original) uses belt drive instead. Neither is objectively better — instant start-up, rock-steady speed under load, and enough torque to nudge or backspin the record — the reason DJs and scratch decks are built this way versus a motor that's mechanically isolated from the platter by an elastic belt, which is the usual route to a quieter noise floor — the default choice across most of hi-fi.

Operation differs: the JVC QL-A7 is semi-automatic, the Rega Planar 2 (original) is manual.

Bottom line: the JVC QL-A7 has the lower reference price; the table shows which documented features change with the $0 gap.

Compare two different decks →