EAT C-Sharp vs Transrotor Fat Bob S
Side-by-side specifications and a plain-English account of the recorded differences. Full profiles: EAT C-Sharp · Transrotor Fat Bob S.
| Specification | EAT C-Sharp |
Transrotor Fat Bob S |
|---|---|---|
| Price | Highlighted difference. $5,000 | $7,890 |
| Category | High-end | High-end |
| Status | current | current |
| Years | 2015–present | 2012–present |
| Drive | belt drive | belt drive |
| Speeds | 33/45 rpm | 33/45 rpm |
| Operation | manual | manual |
| Cartridge supplied | sold bare or with Jo No.5 (MC) | sold bare |
| Phono stage | No | No |
| USB output | No | No |
| Bluetooth | No | No |
| Platter | aluminium with TPE and recycled-vinyl mat | aluminium, heavy |
| Tonearm | 10" carbon-fibre | sold bare |
| Wow & flutter | — | — |
Practical differences
Highlighted cells show a lower reference price, support for more listed speeds, or the presence of a convenience feature. They are not an overall score.
There's a real gap here: $2,890 separates them, with the Transrotor Fat Bob S the pricier of the two.
Both are belt-drive, so that part of the experience should feel similar on either deck: a motor that's mechanically isolated from the platter by an elastic belt, which is the usual route to a quieter noise floor — the default choice across most of hi-fi.
Bottom line: the EAT C-Sharp has the lower reference price; the table shows which documented features change with the $2,890 gap.
Live retailer offers
Checking current in-stock offers for EAT C-Sharp…
Retailer searches
1 US retailer stock EAT — linked directly to the product page where we have one, otherwise to a site search for the deck.
| Retailer | Type | Shipping | Product link |
|---|---|---|---|
| Upscale Audio | hifi independent | Free USA shipping on orders over $99 (exclusions for oversized items). | View at Upscale Audio ↗ |
Live retailer offers
Checking current in-stock offers for Transrotor Fat Bob S…